Is 100% coverage worth it ?
🧵The debate The debate over targetting 100% code coverage has long divided software engineers. Some believe it’s worth the time to test everything while others argue that aiming 80% or 90% is sufficient. Achieving such high coverage is clearly a significant amount of work, especially on a legacy/non-trivial codebase. I recently had to start a new project from scratch and asked myself the question: should I bother to aim for 100% coverage or should I settle for an arbitrary threshold like 90% ? ...